mellicious: "I think the subtext here is rapidly becoming text." (subtext Buffy quote)
I found a list that came from LitHub, 10 Books That Defined the 70s. I think I've seen a bunch of things like this over time, right? (Apparently LitHub did every decade starting with 1900 a few years ago. I know other places have done similar things, too. Magazines - Time magazine comes to mind - used to love to do stuff like this periodically. I say that in the past tense but I'm sure they still do.)

I turned 10 in 1970, so I was 19 in 1979 - that covers a lot of ground. I think I was in 5th grade in 1970, and I started college at UT in 1977. I was an English major for three of those years (starting in 1978), so I read some things, or at least knew of some things, because of that that I certainly wouldn't have otherwise. I'm going to go through all of the list and some of the other things listed at the bottom that presumably are sort of the runners-up.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

One Hundred Years of Solitude, by Gabriel Garcia Marquez (published in Spanish in 1967 but not published in English until 1970) - I read this a long time ago, and I need to re-read it. (Garcia Marquez won a Nobel Prize in 1982, so I'm wondering if I read it about that time. I remember hearing about it in classes but I don't think it was ever required reading.) I remembered being sort of baffled by the "magical realism" stuff, which is a bit odd since I grew up reading SF/F constantly and it's not like it was really anything new to me. This is why I say I need to re-read it.

Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret, by Judy Blume (1970) - it's weird, but I'm not entirely sure whether I ever read this or not. I kind of think I did but I don't remember it much if I did. (This would be consistent with having read it once & never re-reading it,, I guess.) I know I read some of Judy Blume's books. Note that there's apparently a movie coming out based on this, I think this spring.

The Joy of Sex, by Alex Comfort (1972) - I remember sneaking around with my friends to clandestinely read bits of this as a pre-teen or young teenager - at their houses, because if my parents had it they hid it extremely well. I've definitely never read the whole thing - by the time I was old enough to read it openly, it seemed dated.

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1972) - I read this sometime in the years I lived in Austin, maybe in the early 80s. I think I may still have the paperback, but I haven't re-read it in a long time.

Gravity's Rainbow, by Thomas Pynchon (1973) - this is one of those books I tried and tried to read, and just never got interested in it enough to keep going.

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, by Robert Pirsig (1974) - ditto on the above, basically. I remember a (male) English professor going on about this being a neglected classic, back in the day, but I tried and couldn't ever get interested. I think I had my last try at it just a few years ago, and I got far enough to be pretty sure I wasn't going to like it. I suspect it's more of a guy thing.

All the President's Men, by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward (1974) - read it long ago, loved it, have re-read it many times. I don't know when I first read it, maybe late 70s.

Helter Skelter, by Vincent Bugiosi with Curt Gentry (1974) - I don't think I read this in high school, because I think my mother would have had a fit. She let me read many "adult" books as a teen (meaning things with violence and some sex, not actual porn or anything - I usually use The Dirty Dozen as an example) but she was very religious which made her very skittery about things involving Satanism etc. I do remember talking about the Manson family in high school (actually at school, I mean - like, I remember talking about The White Album, with reference to Manson & his followers.). The miniseries apparently came out in 1976 (so did Roots, below) so that probably is why we were talking about it in school. I did read this book, multiple times, but I don't think it was until later.

Roots, by Alex Haley (1976) - I saw the miniseries and I read the book, somewhere vaguely around this time, but I'm not really sure when I first read it. It might have been around that time, '76 or '77.

The Shining, by Stephen King (1977) - I've read this, but I think it was much more recently. I've always read some of King's books (see Carrie, below) but I mostly skip the "scary" stuff in favor of The Stand, The Dark Tower, etc. I don't think I saw the movie or read the book until much later. Still, it was such a huge hit that it was impossible not to know at least a little about it.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So that's the "winning" 10. I do think those do give you a good feel for the 70s, between them. But many of the ones below are the same way, and I have comments about some of them, too:

Solaris, by Stanislaw Lem (1st English translation, 1970) - I've never read this, and I know there's a movie I've never seen, also. I don't know why, because this is totally in my sci-fi-loving wheelhouse.

Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, by Dee Brown (1970) - I know exactly why I've never read this - it's because I know it would totally depress me. But I should have read it anyway. (If I can get through books about the Civil War, I can get through this.)

Deliverance, by James Dickey (1970) - I know I read this, but probably not til much later. 80s, maybe?

Play It As It Lays, by Joan Didion (1970) - I picked up a Didion habit after The White Album came out, so I probably read this in the 80s.

The Exorcist,
by W.P. Blatty (1971) - I know my mom wouldn't let us go see the movie (I think that was about '73?) and I know I read the book, multiple times I believe. I imagine it was at least somewhat later, though.

Jonathan Livingston Seagull, by Richard Bach (1973) - I really can't believe they didn't put this in the top 10, just because this book is so, so 70s. I doubt that I read it in '73, but I bet it was in the mid-70s. It was dumb, but somehow kind of compelling.

Invisible Cities, by Italo Calvino (1st English translation, 1974) - this is one I know I read because I heard about it in class. I don't remember if it was actually required reading, but I know I loved it and read it several more times, at least.

Jaws, by Peter Benchley (1974) - I loved this book. I read it and I saw the movie, I don't remember exactly when. This is something my mother would have let me get by with reading, so I probably first read it in high school, anyway.

Carrie, by Stephen King (1974) - I feel like I read this in the late 70s, but I'm not sure. (Oddly, I don't think I saw the movie until much later.)

Ragtime, by E.L. Doctorow (1974) - Man, I loved this book. I bet it was more like around 1980 when I first read it, though.

Interview with the Vampire, by Anne Rice (1976) - loved this, too. I think I've said this before, but when we got married (which was in '87), Rob and I each had a copy of this - identical paperbacks. Again, I'm not sure when I first read it. I'd guess college.

The World According to Garp (1978) - I read all of John Irving's books for a long time, although I quit at some point. (I think I started thinking they were all kind of alike.) Loved this one, though, read and re-read it.

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, by Douglas Adams (1979) - I imagine I read this pretty shortly after it came out - it was one of those books that everybody was suddenly reading.

Sophie's Choice, by William Styron (1979) - this was another one of those books. I'm pretty sure I read it fairly soon after it came out. I remember reading reviews of this, and how much they all loved it. And I did too.

mellicious: Happy New Year! (new year gif)
Happy New Year, y'all. 2021 wasn't a bad year for me personally, but it was a pretty bad year for the world in general, wasn't it? Insurrections, climate change, ugh. So let's hope 2022 is going to be an improvement. (I'm not really holding my breath for that, I'm afraid.)

If I get around to it in time, I'll do a movie wrap-up tomorrow. (I'll probably put it up even if I don't manage to do it in time to post it on Holidailies. The last couple of years I have been posting periodically about movies here even if I don't post about anything else.)

Assuming I don't finish any more books before midnight, the list of new novels I've read this year is going to end at 69. (This is not meant to be a fiction-only list, but apparently the only non-fiction books I finished were a handful of Civil War books that I had already read some years ago. Nothing new.) I highlighted a few things that stood out to me, some of which were actually new books (Winterkeep, Leviathan Falls) and some of which were not new this year but I hadn't gotten around to reading before (News of the World, Lock In).

As far as series go, I really enjoyed the "Lady Julia" series, which are period mysteries, and the "Lily Bard" series, which is categorized as a "dark cozy" mystery series, as I understand it (written by Charlaine Harris, who also wrote the "True Blood" series). I probably read more mysteries this year than I've read in some years, or possibly ever - I can't be sure about that since I only recently started keeping lists of my reading again.

(I really think it's kind of absurd to even post my list at all, but I posted it once before so I figured I would update. I don't ever keep up on Goodreads so this is the only place it's online.) (And I don't consider it a competition. I don't work full-time so I have a lot more reading time than most people.)

I don't particularly set any goals for myself about reading, normally. I read plenty already, I don't have to encourage myself to do that, in general. Left to myself I re-read an awful lot, so that's why I have started keeping up with how much new stuff I read. I did set a goal for myself last year to read 18 books that were new to me, and I passed that ages ago. The only goal I have set myself for the future is to keep reading at least a couple of new things a month. And I made a "to-read" list - it started with an idea I'd seen to do "22 books to read in '22" but I hit 22 and kept going - I have an whole lot of unread books on my Kindle, so I guess you'd have to say getting through some of that list is also a goal.



New-to-me reading in 2021
  1. Winterkeep (Graceling Realms #4)
  2. Star Wars Aftermath
  3. Silent in the Grave (Lady Julia #1)
  4. A Court of Thorns and Roses
  5. Cocaine Blues (Miss Fisher #1)
  6. Flying Too High (Miss Fisher #2)
  7. Silent in the Sanctuary (Lady Julia #2)
  8. Silent on the Moors (Lady Julia #3)
  9. Real Murders (Aurora Teagarden #1)
  10. Murder on the Ballarat Train (Miss Fisher #3)
  11. Shakespeare's Landlord (Lily Bard #1)
  12. Murder in the Heir (Violet Carlyle #1)
  13. Kennington House Murder (Violet Carlyle #2)
  14. Shakespeare's Champion (Lily Bard #2)
  15. Murder at the Folly (Violet Carlyle #3)
  16. A Merry Little Murder (Violet Carlyle #4)
  17. Dark Road to Darjeeling (Lady Julia #4)
  18. Murder Among the Roses (Violet Carlyle #5)
  19. Shakespeare's Christmas (Lily Bard #3)
  20. Murder in the Shallows (Violet Carlyle #6)
  21. Shakespeare's Trollop (Lily Bard #4)
  22. The Assassins of Thasalon (Penric & Desdemona) (I originally had this in with the novellas, but I was mistaken)
  23. Shakespeare's Counselor (Lily Bard #5)
  24. Gin and Murder (Violet Carlyle #7)
  25. The Dark Enquiry (Lady Julia #5)
  26. Night of a Thousand Stars
  27. Obsidian Murder (Violet Carlyle #8)
  28. Murder at the Ladies' Club (Violet Carlyle #9)
  29. Wedding Vows and Murder (Violet Carlyle #10)
  30. The Magic of Found Objects
  31. An Untimely Death (Anna Fairweather #1)
  32. An Unfortunate Demise (Anna Fairweather #2)
  33. What the Dead Leave Behind (A Gilded Age Mystery #1)
  34. An Uninvited Corpse (Anna Fairweather #3)
  35. An Unexpected Misfortune (Anna Fairweather #4)
  36. Shadow Hunter (Rosie O'Grady's Paranormal Bar and Grill #1)
  37. Strange Practice (Dr Greta Helsing #1)
  38. The Schoolmistress of Emerson Pass (Emerson Pass #1)
  39. An Unhappy Murder (Anna Fairweather #5)
  40. An Untidy End (Anna Fairweather #6)
  41. Lock In (Lock In #1)
  42. Blue Midnight (Blue Mountain #1)
  43. Austenland
  44. A Rogue By Any Other Name (Rule of Scoundrels)
  45. Head On (Lock In #2)
  46. When Sorrows Come (October Daye #15)
  47. A Heart So Fierce and Broken (Cursebreakers #2)
  48. Love at First
  49. News of the World
  50. Ancillary Justice (Imperial Radch #1)
  51. Vanished (McLand & Callahan #1)
  52. The Murder at the Vicarage (Miss Marple #1)
  53. The Other Bennet Sister
  54. If Ever I Should Love You (Spinster Heiresses #1)
  55. A King of Infinite Space (Long Beach Homicide #1)
  56. The 7-1/2 Deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle
  57. The Pain Scale (Long Beach Homicide #2)
  58. A Cold and Broken Hallelujah (Long Beach Homicide #3)
  59. Half a Soul (Regency Faerie Tales #1)
  60. Come Twilight (Long Beach Homicide #4)
  61. A Deal with the Elf King (Married to Magic #1)
  62. Bridge to Terabithia
  63. Ten Thousand Stitches (Regency Faerie Tales #2)
  64. Someone Perfect (Westcotts)
  65. Leviathan Falls (The Expanse #9)
  66. A Dance with the Fae Prince (Married to Magic #2)
  67. Sleigh Bells Ring
  68. In a Holidaze
  69. A Subtle Murder (Rose Beckingham #1)
novellas:
  • Midsummer Night (Lady Julia)
  • Silent Night (Lady Julia)
  • Twelfth Night (Lady Julia)
  • Bonfire Night (Lady Julia)
  • All Systems Red (Murderbot)
  • Knot of Shadows (Penric & Desdemona)
  • The Lord Sorcier (Regency Faerie Tales)


mellicious: Narnia witch in a carriage pulled by polar bears, captioned "OMGWTFPOLARBEAR!" (polar bear & witch - m15m)
The last Expanse book* came out last week, and I had pre-ordered it so I already have it, but I haven't started it yet. I decided I need to read the two books before it first.

(*so the authors say, apparently they have a contract to do some new series after this!)

For those of you who don't read these, this new book is the ninth book in the series, and they fall loosely into three trilogies. (Or, I don't know, book 4 always feels sort of like a semi-standalone to me, but 1-3 definitely more or less go together and so do 5 and 6.) I re-read the earlier ones this year already (1-6, that is) but I decided to stop there and wait until closer to time for the new one. I got through #7 a few days ago - that one's called Persepolis Rising - and I'm still in the early part of book 8 - Tiamat's Wrath. I don't really know why I feel like I must read the new one the minute it comes out, anyway, but I keep feeling like I'm "late" - it's silly, really. Besides, I actually had pre-orders for two books that came out that same day, it turned out, and I did read the other one practically on the spot, because it was a romance novel and I knew it'd go fast. (Mary Balogh, Someone Perfect, if you want to know!)

At work the other day, I read a chapter or two of a book I found on Kindle Unlimited - something called The Dublin Trilogy and the first book was The Man With One of Those Faces (I may be capitalizing that all wrong, sorry). I think that's a hilarious title, and the book is pretty funny. We'll see if I manage to finish it. Actually I have a rule - which I was obviously breaking - that I'm only allowed to re-read things I've already read at work, and not read anything new, on the theory that I'm less likely to get heavily involved with something I've read before. My work involves a lot of interruptions, but we're allowed to do other stuff when it's slow. I've been re-reading Shelby Foote - The Civil War: a narrative, which is three big volumes. That seemed to be something I was less likely to get too involved with - I know how it ends, after all. I have actually gotten through the first volume and on to the second one, although actually the second one might be more dangerous at that because I'm to the point in 1863 where the big stuff is coming up - The WildernessChancellorsville** and Vicksburg and Gettysburg.

I've also been reading more hard sci-fi, which is the Foreigner series by Cherryh. I have read a bunch of those before, but it had been at least a couple of years. I'm probably only reading 1-6. This one also falls into loose trilogies, as far as I've read, but I got bored with it after the third or fourth trilogy where it quit being hard sci-fi at all, really, and became stuff about atevi politics. I think I looked on Amazon and there's something like 17 books now, and I think I just can't, unless somebody who's read them wants to make a case that they get better again at some point!

(I really bounce around between multiple genres - I like hard sci-fi and I like fairy tales and I like at least some romance - particularly Regency romances, if they're well-written. I went on a big kick of reading mysteries earlier this year and I've even read some contemporary romance, which I normally rarely do. I've read some police procedurals lately as well.)


**I just caught myself on this mistake several days late. The Wilderness and Chancellorsville were two Civil War battles that happened about a year apart, in Virginia in 1863 and 1864. I should have thought to check, really - they were fought on basically the same ground, or at least overlapping ground. The one in 1863 is called Chancellorsville (which is a town) and the one in 1864 is called The Wilderness, which was literally a wild area near Chancellorsville. (The South won the battle both times, but Hooker was in charge in 1863, and the army retreated afterwards. By 1864 Grant was in charge, and he did not retreat afterwards, but kept his troops moving forward.)

mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (Buffy quote - subtext)
There was an article once, about a political campaign event. This was in 1984. I think the article was in The Austin Chronicle, but I'm not sure about that, it was too long ago. (I might even have a copy of it somewhere, but I haven't looked for it.) The tone of the article was slightly mocking. It wasn't a very exciting event, that's for sure. Among other things it says that there was music. "Five people dance, " it said. You may have guessed by now that I was there. I was one of the five people who danced. I remember reading the article and saying, "Look, y'all, that's us!" and everybody else looked and laughed and agreed that, yeah, it definitely was. We were the only ones who danced.

In 1984 I was out of school and working at the libraries at UT. I would have been 23-going-on-24. Most of my friends were a little younger than me, some in grad school and some undergrads who were just dawdling - it wasn't at all uncommon to take 5 or even 6 years to finish your undergrad degree, if you had parents who would cooperate with that. If you've been reading here in past Decembers, you've seen me talk about going to concerts a lot - this was the period of my life when that most of that happened. I had a little group of friends I hung around with and we did a lot of going to concerts and going to clubs and eating out, the usual stuff for single people in their twenties. (And, if you're wondering about the five people dancing thing, we tended to dance as a group. We were mixed sexes and nobody was a couple. There wasn't always five of us, but when we went where there was dancing, we just all got up and danced without worrying about pairing off.) (I don't think that's unusual nowadays but thirty-odd years ago it still was.)

And we worked on Gary Hart's campaign in 1984. We didn't work on it very hard, mind you - we had jobs and school and all that. We weren't real campaign workers who were there all the time. Some of my friends may have been more involved, but I only remember doing two things - one of which was going to this event, which was at one of the big hotels down on Riverside Drive, and was on a weekend (at least I think it was a weekend) when Gary Hart was actually in Austin. He didn't come to the reception that I talked about above. I don't think we saw him talk or anything, either, because I think I would remember that, if it happened. But we did see him - we were on one walkway in the hotel and he was down below us. We waved and he waved back. That was it.

The other thing was that we gave out flyers or something on the day of the primary. I didn't enjoy that - I'm not good at talking to strangers, generally, much less accosting them with political stuff. Between that, and the way that Hart imploded later on (that happened in 1988, but I had to look it up because I had forgotten), I've never worked on a campaign again. I'm kind of a political junkie - I follow politics closely, and I donate money to various campaigns, but I've never quite been able to bring myself to volunteer again. These days I'm embarrassed to admit that, but it's true. Part of it is a deep-seated conviction that you can't trust individual politicians that came largely from having hitched my wagon to the Gary Hart train long ago.

(I don't know if I'll go see The Front Runner, the movie about Gary Hart. The reviews aren't that great, and I doubt that Rob would be thrilled to go. But it was because of the existence of the movie that it occurred to me to talk about this.)

45 years

Jun. 17th, 2017 03:50 am
mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (Buffy quote - bored)
 Forty-five years ago this week (it was Flag Day, that's the only reason I remember the exact date still) I had heart surgery to fix a heart murmur I was born with. I was 12. I saw that it was Flag Day this week and I did the math and came up with that rather staggering number - 45 - and so I also noticed it tonight on MSNBC when they said that the Watergate break-in was 45 years ago this week. I didn't remember that, but then it wasn't big news at the time, either. It only became big news later on. But that means that happened while I was in the hospital recovering - I was really bored sitting in the hospital for a whole week, at least after a couple of days when I started feeling better. I remember that well. I don't specifically remember watching the news, but everybody watched the evening news back then (usually referred to as "watching Walter Cronkite" the way I remember it) and it's possible I did. I do think I knew about that break-in pretty early on.

But that might just be in my head. I do know I remember being mad about the Watergate hearings being all that was on on the TV - this was during the summer, I'm assuming that was in 1974. And I remember Nixon resigning and I know I knew the basics about it at the time, at least, but it's hard to be sure how much of all the stuff that happened in that two-year time period I really remember from the time it was happening and how much I learned later, from All the President's Men (both the movie and the book) and so forth. I do think now that all of that may be a lot of the reason I'm so interested in politics today, though.
mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (cat - yuck)
So the song representing 1974 ended up being the Doobie Brothers:


I was thinking of "Sweet Home Alabama" just because I remember it so vividly from that year, but the whole Neil Young business sticks in my craw and I couldn't bear to use it. (Wikipedia has a whole page on the song including a section on the controversy in case you don't know what I'm talking about.) The members of Lynyrd Skynyrd have apparently claimed at various times that they didn't mean to say they supported George Wallace, but if that's true they should've made that clearer. I do buy that they may well have meant the lyrics generally as a sort of "not all Southerners" thing, in a way, but still, it's not much of an excuse. So as a general representative of that kind of music, I give you the Doobie Brothers instead. They're a California band, as I understand it, but it's about the South, at least! And I loved this song at the time, although I'm not sure I really knew who sang it back when I was 14. The Doobie Brothers were not as famous then as they'd become later on.

(Plus if I was still waffling about SHA, there's the Confederate flag on the cover of the single. Ugh.)

This was also the year of "Hooked on a Feeling" - people went around going "oohga-oohga-oohga-chaka" all the time - but that's gotten so much airplay from Guardians of the Galaxy that I didn't feel like that would be that interesting a choice. (I do still love that song, though.) (Incidentally, I watched GotG the other night on iTunes - it's still awesome. I don't know why I love it so much, but I do. Also the HD picture AND the sound were surprisingly awesome on my 20" computer screen and dinky little Dell speakers.)

Wikipedia lists the #1 song of the year as "Kung Fu Fighting" which I find a bit surprising, though I do know that when people weren't going "oohga-chaka" they were doing fake kung fu chops, that year. (But actually kung fu & karate had been sort of a craze for several years, as I remember it.)

Of course this was also the year that Nixon resigned. I remember that the Watergate hearings were on the TV endlessly in the summer, and we were mad because by then we were in the habit of watching soap operas when we were home, and they weren't on, most of the time, because they were pre-empted by the news. ("All My Children" was the one we especially watched, at that time.)

Added: One thing about Guardians of the Galaxy that I apparently failed to take in the two times I saw it in the theater, and I'm sure many or most of you are ahead of me on this - I didn't really snap to the big gap between the time Peter Quill was abducted by aliens (1988, the movie says) and the time the songs on the Awesome Mix were from, in the 70s. In other words, they were not the songs that he would have chosen at the time, they were the songs his mother liked when she was his age, maybe. Meaning that his mother was probably somewhere in my general age range, maybe a little younger, if anything. (I was 28 in 1988, plenty old to have a kid.) I only figured this out because I was looking up the songs of 1973 the same night I was watching the movie - although actually I think it was the date of his abduction that I was a bit unclear on.
mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (dragon)
Another nugget of medical history from my anatomy textbook:

Plato believed that the womb (uterus), if unused for a long period, became "indignant." This indignant womb then wandered around the body, inhibiting the body's spirit and causing disease. According to the male thinkers of the day, a woman was so controlled by her wandering womb that she was considered irrational and prone to emotional outbursts and fits of hysteria. This belief was the reason that the womb was named the hystera. The term has persisted in medical terminology...

I knew about the relationship between "hysterectomy" and "hysterics" - if I hadn't, it was pointed out in my Medical Terminology book as well - but what I hadn't heard before was the part about the indignant wandering womb. (However, the Greeks also believed that the arteries carried air, so it's not that their medical knowledge was otherwise all that sophisticated, in any case.)
mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (Dr Who - blink)
Remember back when I posted the word cryptorchidism and I was all interested in why "orchid" was a root word for testes? Well, apparently I am not the only one interested in that - there's actually a whole "fun facts" box about it in the anatomy book, including exactly who's responsible. Here it is, verbatim:

Do You Know . . .
Why Aristotle called the testicle the
orchis?
The root of the orchid plant is olive shaped; in Greek the shape is called an orchis. Noticing the similarity between the shape of the orchid root and the testicles. Aristotle dubbed the testicle orchis. The word orchis is still used in medical terms. For example, orchitis refers to inflammation of the testicles, and orchiectomy refers to the surgical removal of the testicles. The word testis comes from the Latin and means to bear witness to. The word testes shares the same Latin root as the word testify. In ancient Rome, only men could bear witness, or testify. To show the importance of their testimony, the held their testicles as they spoke.

Huh. Well, that's interesting.
mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (breathe)
Before the storm

This picture makes me a bit sad. I found it on my extra memory card yesterday; I had forgotten all about it. We took this on Thursday before the storm, when we were on the way out. I was driving and I remembered that I had been meaning to take a picture of this wreath, so I pulled over and Rob rolled down the window (only partway, as you can see!) and took this. This is a marker showing the location of the Galveston orphans' home in 1900. The home was actually across the Seawall from here - it was where Wal-Mart is now. The anniversary of the 1900 storm is September 8th-9th, and this was taken on the 11th, so the wreath was still relatively fresh. When we came back after the storm, just the pole was there - the sign itself, and the wreath, of course, was gone.

I've talked about the story of the orphans here before, I think. Here's a piece that talks about it, from the Galveston paper. (Here's the Wikipedia article on the 1900 storm itself.) It's a very sad story. The nuns tied the children to them with clothesline, hoping to keep them together, and some stories say that that itself caused so many of them to get killed, because the lines snagged on the debris. But knowing what I know now about what the storm this year did to that area - and bear in mind that I lived about a block from here, until September - I can't imagine that many of them would have survived no matter what, with no Seawall to protect them. The Seawall was the only thing that kept that area from being completely underwater in Ike, and of course some water came over anyway. And Ike was a smaller storm.


Note that Ike came in on the night of September 12th-13th. It was three months ago today.

Jitters

Sep. 10th, 2008 03:55 pm
mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (umbrellas)
It's hard to relax with a hurricane breathing down your neck, as it were. We have been reading up on various storms this morning - this article (which also talks about my place of employment) mentions the 1900 storm, which a lot of people know about. Less well-known nowadays is Hurricane Carla in 1961, a very large category 4/5 which came in at Matagorda Bay and did a lot of damage in Galveston. I knew a lot about Carla, but I didn't understand until now how very big it was. I don't actually remember it - I was a toddler - but it's part of the family lore. I may have told that story before, but if not I'll have to explain later, I don't have time now. I still have to work.


Later: the new tracks seem to be shifting our way. Damn. My boss is gone to a meeting about it so we may hear something new when she gets back.

Plans

Aug. 16th, 2007 09:53 pm
mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (umbrellas)
Inspired by that scary-looking track for Dean that came out this afternoon, we went and spent a godawful amount on groceries - we were going anyway, but we bought extra canned stuff and so forth - and we came up with a tentative plan for what we'll do if we have to evacuate. There's no question of staying here if it really comes right at us - it wouldn't take much of a hurricane to flood this place - but we do have Mom's place, which is also in a flood zone, if it came to anything major, but which is 25 miles or so inland, at least. So that would be the first stage, going there. Yeah, it's half empty, but it does have a bed and some furniture, and electricity and water. No cable, no phone, so it's not exactly a long-term plan, but it'd do for somewhere to sleep. And we might repair further inland, to my aunt's, if it becomes anything big. (Also, as I said to Rob, if we end up getting several days off, we might want to go there just for something to do. It will get boring fast with no internet and no cable.)

Yeah, I know this is early. Dean is still a long way off, but it never hurts to have a plan.

Come to think of it, not everybody knows where I live, so let me explain exactly why it's so much of a concern. After the 1900 hurricane (aka Isaac's Storm, if you've read that), they built a seawall in Galveston, right? It's 12 feet high, and they basically jacked up the whole town to match - and I mean that literally. They put everything up on stilts, and filled in underneath it. All of the east half of Galveston starts out 12 feet above sea level on the Gulf side and then slopes back towards the bay. However, where we live wasn't in town at that time, it was out in the country, and the Seawall didn't come down this far, originally. And later, when they did extend it down here, they didn't do the filling-in part, it just slopes right back down on the back side. And that's where we live, right behind the Seawall, a couple of hundred feet from the Gulf. And I don't know how far we are above sea-level, exactly, but it's not far. Five feet, maybe, at a guess. (Maybe. I wouldn't be a bit surprised to find out it was two or three.) And we live in a first-floor apartment. Galveston doesn't normally flood in any major way, because of that sloping-back-to-the bay business, but there's still storm surge. So this is not somewhere you want to be in anything but the tiniest hurricane.

(We were discussing something today that I'd practically forgotten, though. We came to a hurricane party at these very apartments, long before we lived here. Well, it was more of a tropical-storm party, really. We sat in somebody's third-floor apartment till about 4am and got drunk and played Jeopardy! as I recall. And I remember looking down at the pool, and they had taken all the poolside furniture and sunk it in the pool. Wonder if they still do that. Seems like getting it out would be a bitch.)

In 1960...

Jan. 18th, 2007 10:45 pm
mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (baa)
In 1960 (the year you were born)

Dwight Eisenhower is president of the US

Sit-ins being after 4 black college students in North Carolina refuse to move from a deli counter when denied service

A U-2 reconnaissance plane belonging to the US is shot down in the Soviet Union

Hurricane "Donna" strikes the East Coast causing over 100 deaths in the US and the Antilles

John F. Kennedy defeats Vice President Richard Nixon in the presidential race

Cassius Clay (who later took the name Muhammad Ali) wins his first professional fight

Michael Stipe, Tony Robbins, Bono, John F. Kennedy, Jr., and Jeffrey Dahmer are born

Pittsburgh Pirates win the World Series

Philadelphia Eagles win the NFL championship

Montreal Canadiens win the Stanley Cup

Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho is the top grossing film

To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee is published

The Beatles make their debut in Hamburg, Germany

The Flintstones debut
mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (breathe)
Somebody on my friendslist wrote a "where I was" entry, and it reminded me that I've sort of been meaning to talk about this all day. I've talked about it before, but I think that entry is gone.

The thing is, I practically missed 9/11. (Not that that's necessarily a bad thing.)

I had called in sick, because I woke up with my usual sinus crap, headache & dizziness & all that stuff, and I slept late and then I read the rest of the morning. Nobody knew I was home (well, except my co-workers) because I didn't realize how bad I was feeling until after Rob had already left, so nobody called me to tell me, they just assumed I was at work & I would already know. I don't remember what I was reading, but I must've been really engrossed in it, because it was 2:00 before I got up. (It's possible that some napping went on somewhere in there, too.) When I did get up, I turned on the computer, not the TV - but I had AOL in those days (yeah, yeah, I know) and the picture of the burning towers was on the welcome screen. Some welcome. So then I turned on the TV, and I saw.

I remember that my first reaction was disbelief. And it's funny, I watched the CNN replay of the original coverage today, and it seemed like that was everybody else's first reaction, too. Not really surprising, but I missed all that at the time, see. Even after the 2nd plane flew into the towers, the commentators were still discussing whether it could possibly have been a mistake - some kind of terrible error  with navigational equipment. Yeah, right. Even though it was a perfectly clear day. And it was also very clear that when the first tower collapsed, nobody was wanting to believe what they were seeing. Even after the dust cleared enough that you could clearly see that there was no tower there, nobody would say it. Finally they started saying that part of the tower might have collapsed, that was as far as they went in the coverage I saw. And I mean, I'm not saying that that was an unnatural reaction to a huge event like this one - I'm just saying that I really didn't even know until today that that was the reaction at all. Even after all the years and all the press coverage, there are still big gaps in my knowledge about that day.

They also kept talking today about how beautiful the weather was that day, and I don't remember them saying that at the time. - They probably didn't, actually. It's the kind of thing you think about afterwards. It was beautiful here too. The only reason I went outside at all was because I had a 4:00 psych appointment. (This was during my Psycho Depressed Woman period.) I remember that the sky was very blue and that the dragonflies were swarming - something they do this time of year, but I've never seen as many as I saw that day. Now whenever I see a lot of dragonflies I always think about that day.

I've always thought that having missed all the early coverage of that day made it just the slightest bit easier to get through. Or maybe it was just partly the depressed state I was already in - my emotions were pretty much encased in cotton-wool already, at the time. I mean, I was still somewhat traumatized, definitely, but not to the degree that a lot of other people seemed to be. And at least by the time I found out what was happening, the worst of the uncertainty was over. I do think that was a help.

You know, though, there was another thing going on there. Maybe I'm just a more skeptical person by nature, because I always believed that there would be a terrorist attack in the US eventually. Do you remember people saying things like, "Oh, that'll never happen here"? I do. And I never believed them. I certainly didn't imagine the horror and the magnitude of that attack, but it didn't surprise me a bit that there was one. (I mean, hell, there had already been one. 1993, wasn't it?)

(This is sort of rambly but I'm sleepy and I don't have the patience to edit it any more. I hope this makes some sense.)
mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (nautilus)
I was talking to Col about a month ago about some research he's doing, and in the course of that conversation he said that he was hopeless with dates. It's funny, because I am good with dates sometimes (as I am about to attempt to demonstrate) and hopeless other times (when was the Hundred Years War again?), and I think the difference is context. I had been talking over on Diary-X before the big crash - maybe someday you'll be able to read that again - about how I used to read about the Civil War all the time, and I can still pretty much tell you approximate dates for all the major battles, and the reason why is because I have read so much that I'm pretty damn familiar with the context in which a battle was fought, so I'm not operating in a vacuum. With the example of the Hundred Years War, even though we're talking about a war that went on for a good chunk of a century, I can't remember for sure which century that was, because I can't ever remember anything specific like who was king at the time, things like that that would give me a clue about the dates. With the Civil War, if I forget when an event was - a battle or anything else - well, I probably know it happened right around the same time as something else, so I can usually figure it out. And so to prove it, the brain-dump. The weekend of the marathon I was sitting around the hotel with nothing to do and I started writing a short "summary" of the Civil War. (I did it without looking anything up whatsoever, so it's possible there are errors. Hopefully nothing major.) And here's part 1, which covers approximately the first year of the war. I make no promises about when or if the rest will get done, although the next couple of major battles - the Seven Days and 2nd Manassas - are already written. Also, it's occurred to me that if I can just get through 1863, the rest ought to go pretty fast. (Because how much do you really need to say about a siege? 1864 was fairly boring, comparatively speaking.)

(This was the entry that I started typing up once before, and the power went out and it got lost. So cross your fingers. Although I do have the text saved as a back-up this time.)

Profile

mellicious: Quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer's 1st episode: "The earth is doomed." (Default)
mellicious

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1 2 345 6 7
8 9 1011 1213 14
151617181920 21
2223 2425 262728
2930 31    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 08:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios